Hide table of contents

We make AI narrations of EA Forum posts available via our audio player and podcast feeds:

EA Forum (Curated & Popular)
Curated posts and posts with 125+ karma.
Apple Podcasts | Spotify | RSS | Other platforms

EA Forum (All audio)
Curated posts and posts with 30+ karma.
Apple Podcasts | Spotify | RSS  | Other platforms

We’re thinking about changing our narrator’s voice.

There are three new voices on the shortlist. They’re all similarly good in terms of comprehension, emphasis, error rate, etc. They just sound different—like people do.[1]

We think they all sound similarly agreeable. But, thousands of listening hours are at stake, so we thought it’d be worth giving listeners an opportunity to vote—just in case there’s a strong collective preference.

Listen and vote

Please listen here:

https://files.type3.audio/ea-forum-poll/

And vote here:

https://forms.gle/m7Ffk3EGorUn4XU46

It’ll take 1-10 minutes, depending on how much of the sample you decide to listen to.

Don’t overthink it—we’d just like to know if there’s a voice that you’d particularly love (or hate) to listen to.

We’ll collect votes until Monday December 16th. Thanks!

Other feedback?

We’re always keen for general feedback on the narration service. Please do share thoughts on the form, or in the comments on this post.

  1. ^

    We periodically the various text-to-speech services, with a particular focus on ElevenLabs, Speechify, Azure, Amazon, BeyondWords, OpenAI, Murf.ai, Play.ht, Deepgram and a few open source libraries. The current shortlist was created based on factors like performance, reliability, customisation options and price. We won’t consider other voice options this winter, but if there are other voices you particularly like, please do let us know, and we’ll make sure they’re considered in future reviews. ↩︎

27

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments4


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Happy to see more work here.

Minor question - but are you familiar with any experiments that might show which are the most understandable, especially at high speeds? It seems to me like some voices are much better than others at 2x+ speeds, I assume it should be possible to optimize this. This is probably the main thing I personally care about. 

Thanks for all your hard work on the audio narrations and making EA Forum content accessible!

Question: Do you intend to license the audio under a Creative Commons license? Since EA Forum text since 2022 is licensed under CC-BY 4.0, all that's legally required is any attribution info provided by the source material and a link to the license; derived works don't have to be also licensed under CC-BY. However, to the extent that AI-generated narrations can be protected by copyright at all, it seems appropriate to use CC-BY, or maybe CC-BY-SA to enforce modifications being under the same terms.

Hi @peterhartree, I'm getting an error when trying to open the voting form: 

 

"You need permission - This form can only be viewed by users in the owner's organization."
 

Fixed—thank you.

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
The AI safety community has grown rapidly since the ChatGPT wake-up call, but available funding doesn’t seem to have kept pace. However, there’s a more recent dynamic that’s created even better funding opportunities, which I witnessed as a recommender in the most recent SFF grant round.[1]   Most philanthropic (vs. government or industry) AI safety funding (>50%) comes from one source: Good Ventures. But they’ve recently stopped funding several categories of work (my own categories, not theirs): * Many Republican-leaning think tanks, such as the Foundation for American Innovation. * “Post-alignment” causes such as digital sentience or regulation of explosive growth. * The rationality community, including LessWrong, Lightcone, SPARC, CFAR, MIRI. * High school outreach, such as Non-trivial. In addition, they are currently not funding (or not fully funding): * Many non-US think tanks, who don’t want to appear influenced by an American organisation (there’s now probably more than 20 of these). * They do fund technical safety non-profits like FAR AI, though they’re probably underfunding this area, in part due to difficulty hiring for this area the last few years (though they’ve hired recently). * Political campaigns, since foundations can’t contribute to them. * Organisations they’ve decided are below their funding bar for whatever reason (e.g. most agent foundations work). OP is not infallible so some of these might still be worth funding. * Nuclear security, since it’s on average less cost-effective than direct AI funding, so isn’t one of the official cause areas (though I wouldn’t be surprised if there were some good opportunities there). This means many of the organisations in these categories have only been able to access a a minority of the available philanthropic capital (in recent history, I’d guess ~25%). In the recent SFF grant round, I estimate they faced a funding bar 1.5 to 3 times higher. This creates a lot of opportunities for other donors
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
LewisBollard
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- Progress for factory-farmed animals is far too slow. But it is happening. Practices that once seemed permanent — like battery cages and the killing of male chicks — are now on a slow path to extinction. Animals who were once ignored — like fish and even shrimp — are now finally seeing reforms, by the billions. It’s easy to gloss over such numbers. So, as you read the wins below, I encourage you to consider each of these animals as an individual. A hen no longer confined to a cage, a chick no longer macerated alive, a fish no longer dying a prolonged death. I also encourage you to reflect on the role you and your fellow advocates and funders played in these wins. I’m inspired by what you’ve achieved. I hope you will be too. 1. About Cluckin’ Time. Over 1,000 companies globally have now fulfilled their pledges to go cage-free. McDonald’s implemented its pledge in the US and Canada two years ahead of schedule, sparing seven million hens from cages. Subway implemented its pledge in Europe, the Middle East, Oceania, and Indonesia. Yum Brands, owner of KFC and Pizza Hut, reported that for 25,000 of its restaurants it is now 90% cage-free. These are not cheap changes: one UK retailer, Lidl, recently invested £1 billion just to transition part of its egg supply chain to free-range. 2. The Egg-sodus: Cracking Open Cages. In five of Europe’s seven biggest egg markets — France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and the UK — at least two-thirds of hens are now cage-free. In the US, about 40% of hens are — up from a mere 6% a decade ago. In Brazil, where large-scale cage-free production didn’t exist a decade ago, about 15% of hens are now cage-free. And in Japan, where it still barely exists, the nation’s largest egg buyer, Kewpi
Recent opportunities in Building effective altruism
17
cescorza
· · 2m read