On the governance side, one question I'd be excited to see Apollo (and ARC evals & any other similar groups) think/write about is: what happens after a dangerous capability eval goes off?
Of course, the actual answer will be shaped by the particular climate/culture/zeitgeist/policy window/lab factors that are impossible to fully predict in advance.
But my impression is that this question is relatively neglected, and I wouldn't be surprised if sharp newcomers were able to meaningfully improve the community's thinking on this.
As stated in the post itself (section "Status"), we are not yet decided about this and are considering both non-profit and public-benefit-type for-profit style organizations.
Congratulations on launching!
On the governance side, one question I'd be excited to see Apollo (and ARC evals & any other similar groups) think/write about is: what happens after a dangerous capability eval goes off?
Of course, the actual answer will be shaped by the particular climate/culture/zeitgeist/policy window/lab factors that are impossible to fully predict in advance.
But my impression is that this question is relatively neglected, and I wouldn't be surprised if sharp newcomers were able to meaningfully improve the community's thinking on this.
Congratulations, I’m happy to see this launching!
How did you decide to be a not-for-profit? I imagine that the evals/audit work will likely be very lucrative at some point?
As stated in the post itself (section "Status"), we are not yet decided about this and are considering both non-profit and public-benefit-type for-profit style organizations.
This is great to see and the backgrounds of your team members look impressive. I really hope someone will step in to fund this.