The deadline for FTX to file clawback claims against grantees was November 2024. The bankruptcy estate could have filed a plan to extend the two-year statute of limitations, but it appears that they did not do so.
Any recipient of FTX or FTX FF funding who has not had a complaint filed against them in bankruptcy court, and who has not signed a tolling agreement with the bankruptcy estate, should be safe from clawback actions going forward. I encourage you to check with counsel about individual situations.[1] A demand letter is not a court action, and negotiations in response to a demand letter would not toll the statute of limitations.
As always, before you comment in response to this post, I would urge you to assume that lawyers for the FTX Group will see your comments.
- ^
This isn’t legal advice and a lawyer who represents you and can address your specific situation will be able to provide more clarity than a forum post!
Personally since my grant was probably too small to justify the effort of a clawback, and the statute of limitations had passed, I donated all of it, divided between the GiveWell top charities fund and GiveDirectly.
I think it's plausible that grant recipients in countries other than the United States could be subject to clawback action under the laws of those countries, and the applicable limitation period may well be longer.
In my case, I won't be totally certain until the six year limitation period under New Zealand law has run. Luckily there are much more favourable defences under New Zealand law, and even if their prospects of success were higher I somewhat doubt that Sullivan & Cromwell would bother instructing New Zealand counsel to chase up a relatively meagre grant.
If your grant was small (e.g. salary/expenses for one person), you might adopt the same "she'll be right" attitude I'm taking to this. But if you're based in a country other than the United States and got a big grant then you may want to keep this risk in the back of your mind and/or speak with a lawyer in that country.
Epistemic status: I suspect it's more of a hypothetical risk than a real one, but mentioning it for completeness and for the benefit of folks with a very low appetite for risk.
I’m obviously not a bankruptcy lawyer, but I was surprised to read this because I assumed that the statute of limitations depended on the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy estate, not the clawback claimee. Am I wrong? Or are there parallel proceedings in other jurisdictions?