I don't know about medical professionals, but my informal impression that the majority of adults in developed countries knows that massage reduces stress.
Personal perspective, not grounded in research: Similar to yoga or walking, I think the main issue is the counterfactual. Studies tend to show that massage is better than nothing for stress reduction, but is nothing really the baseline we want to use?
Research suggests that massage therapy can be effective in reducing stress levels. Multiple studies have found that massage can significantly decrease self-reported stress and anxiety (Françoise Labrique-Walusis et al., 2010; C. Heard et al., 2012; Bost & Wallis, 2006). Even brief interventions, such as a 5-minute hand or foot massage or a 15-minute weekly massage, can lower perceived stress levels (Françoise Labrique-Walusis et al., 2010; Bost & Wallis, 2006). Mechanical massage chairs have also shown promise in reducing stress for individuals with serious mental illness (C. Heard et al., 2012). While some studies have observed single-treatment reductions in physiological stress markers like salivary cortisol and heart rate, evidence for sustained physiological effects is limited (Moraska et al., 2008). Despite the need for more rigorous research, the existing literature suggests that massage therapy can be a beneficial tool for stress management, particularly in healthcare settings (Françoise Labrique-Walusis et al., 2010; Bost & Wallis, 2006).
Optimalish capitalization/ownership table/agreements have key importance in startup earning-to-give path for the positive impact provided when scale and profitability of the enterprise grows high. So if perhaps even just a couple of founder teams aim in the road to multi-billion( $) valuation, the expected value of providing them with legal/investment doc structuring templates or/and advice could well be worth millions( per all following years where capitalism still dominates).
Similar could be proposed for tax effectivity, but that is less stable and likely less impactful in optimizing.
Both have the drawback that they likely put the bar of raising capital higher for bridging the gap to develop their products and services.
Dumb ways to die, so many dumb ways to die dumb ways to die from super-intelligent AI.
Now as thas has been a really catchy commercial, when similar animation combined with the most discussed scenarios could steer some reasonable minds towards taking the problem seriously.
Is it obvious that( and how) massages reduce stress?
Are studies like https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Effects-of-Scalp-Massage-on-Physiological-and-Shimada-Tsuchida/9e3a7bc9745469a9333ebe493e79a44220111d0c and https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Effect-of-Self-Scalp-Massage-on-Adult-Stress-Kim-Choi/99d1999aa8d8776e55461882cc06c06905ca77b1 rare and mostly ignored?
What actions would measurably promote their conclusions?( I mean more like what strategies would promote actions of more massaging for more wellbeing.)
I don't know about medical professionals, but my informal impression that the majority of adults in developed countries knows that massage reduces stress.
Personal perspective, not grounded in research: Similar to yoga or walking, I think the main issue is the counterfactual. Studies tend to show that massage is better than nothing for stress reduction, but is nothing really the baseline we want to use?
Here is a research summary from Elicit:
Optimalish capitalization/ownership table/agreements have key importance in startup earning-to-give path for the positive impact provided when scale and profitability of the enterprise grows high.
So if perhaps even just a couple of founder teams aim in the road to multi-billion( $) valuation, the expected value of providing them with legal/investment doc structuring templates or/and advice could well be worth millions( per all following years where capitalism still dominates).
Similar could be proposed for tax effectivity, but that is less stable and likely less impactful in optimizing.
Both have the drawback that they likely put the bar of raising capital higher for bridging the gap to develop their products and services.
Who should take this initiative? Charity Entrepreneurship mentioned they had some activity in Social Entrepreneurship and a positive perspective for For-profit Entrepreneurship donating 10+ % of revenues.
These are some links with reasonable likelihood of other relevant folks:
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/funding-high-impact-for-profits
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/WmAkGj7JcnAbwxS2C/even-more-ambitious-altruistic-tech-efforts
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/LQFCtewacZ5ggxWdB/please-pitch-ideas-to-potential-ea-ctos
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/JtE2srazz4Yu6NcuQ/how-many-eas-failed-in-high-risk-high-reward-projects
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/eFQBaQfaNTjSM9LYL/resources-on-the-expected-value-of-founding-a-for-profit
Points of interest/content for the directing docs:
Buybacks aka Shares Redeemability
Donating policies built-in to the founding agreement/constitution
Na začátek vysvětlení: jaké bývá běžné uspořádání vs. jaké je ideální. PROČ má vyřešení vlastnictví takovou důležitost (ve 3 větách)
Přidej svou zkušenost (jak jsi to vyřešil) a návrh svého centrálního řešení
Ještě taky na začátek: 2 věty o tom, komu je článek určen (cílové skupiny čtenářů)
Dumb ways to die,
so many dumb ways to die
dumb ways to die
from super-intelligent AI.
Now as thas has been a really catchy commercial, when similar animation combined with the most discussed scenarios could steer some reasonable minds towards taking the problem seriously.