EY is probably following some sort of infohazard policy when he omits these important steps from his arguments on popular podcasts?
I don’t quite see why it would be dangerous for him to be clearer about them? It would make his arguments sound more convincing, I think.
"One of the big reasons that humans haven't disassembled cows for spare parts..."
What. This is all that we do to them.
True. I think they meant that it's plausible humans would convert the entire population of cows into spare parts, instead of just the ones that have reached a certain age or state, if it served human needs better for cows to not exist.
EY is probably following some sort of infohazard policy when he omits these important steps from his arguments on popular podcasts?
I don’t quite see why it would be dangerous for him to be clearer about them? It would make his arguments sound more convincing, I think.
What. This is all that we do to them.
True. I think they meant that it's plausible humans would convert the entire population of cows into spare parts, instead of just the ones that have reached a certain age or state, if it served human needs better for cows to not exist.