Hey there! I'm Gergő, co-director for The European Network for AI Safety (ENAIS) and founder of EA Hungary and AI Safety Hungary.
If you would like to connect with the Hungarian EA/AIS communities please feel free to message me! We host lots of events! :)
Leave anonymous feedback on me here:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf42mPUB_jf7fYK_3PkyFN3QHbo8AF-upGUjkji-1r8AdEZIA/viewform
Anonymous feedback to EA Hungary here:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeiRUPX8aOz3nWNOIG4KA6-bYCSZ0BRRx69vwmqEn5ctsQ-vw/viewform
Thanks for sharing this, I have been really enjoying reading the comms coming from EAIF/LTFF lately! Here are some observations/feedback on the post:
Below is a fictionalized list of grants the Long-term Future Fund (LTFF) narrowly rejected or accepted in the last 6 months. We aim to broadly convey which grants we barely rejected, while anonymizing any individual one.
[...]
As the grants we’ve fictionalized are grants LTFF narrowly accepted or rejected
After reading the post, I feel like I really miss knowing which of these did or did not pass your bar. I understand that these are fictional examples that are all very close to the bar, but I think others might feel the same way. If you think it might be worth spelling out why you don't think it makes sense to give explicit verdicts.
The above fictionalized examples illustrate grants that are at or just below our current funding threshold
Or perhaps this means all of them were rejected? (It might just be my English, but it's not clear to me if something is at your funding bar, then you would accept or reject it)
Is https://www.impactcolabs.com/ still active? They don't have the feature with the reputation system, but at least it's a start
Is there a public link to this? :)