David van Beveren is Founder and Executive Director of Vegan Hacktivists. In 2019, he created the organization to address gaps in technology & data for the animal protection movement. Since founding, VH has supported over 200 organizations with its services. Prior to Vegan Hacktivists, David ran a software company for K-12 and higher education institutions across the U.S. David is passionate about technology and capacity building. In his spare time, he enjoys reading, watching anime, and playing handpan.
Feel free to reach out to me at anytime if you're working in animal advocacy of of any kind and I'd be glad to offer support.
Love the questions! I'll give it a go because I love discussions on productivity and workload like these.
I would generally never recommend working more than 60 hours, let alone 80. I think the conditions for me as an individual line up well, but for most, do not— and the burnout can be catastrophic. For example:
Anyways, those are my thoughts! Keen to see what other people post or think about this. I agree that we should be more open to talk about this, and to not make this a shame or competition— we all have different brains, mental and physical health, and external factors that can change how productive we are, or even what we consider productive.
For anyone interested, here's a great blog post (from one of our own here) Marius Hobbhahn titled "Guide for Productivity" that I think is a fantastic guide for anyone looking to increase their hours without burning out. For those wondering how sleeping more can actually give you more hours in the day to work, check out Matthew Walker's "Why We Sleep". Lastly, Atomic Habbits is a life-changing book for productivity trill seekers.
I would also suggest that if you can work less hours but increase your productivity, to go for it. Hours ≠ productivity. Cheers!
You guys are doing fantastic work, thanks for posting a detailed look at your programs, funding gap, and the organization itself. I'm especially excited about the capacity building potential your Regranting programme will have in Africa, I hope your team will be able to raise the funds.
On that same note, Vegan Hacktivists may be able to offer free websites, branding and advisory support for organizations and advocates you run across or work with in Africa . If you'd like, shoot us a message and let's have a chat about where we might be able to support your mission.
Thanks again for posting, and good luck!
Hi Joe,
Thanks so much for this amazing feedback!
I see you solved the issue with Donorbox, thanks for the donation! We'll look into if our name might be causing issues, appreciate the note.
I'll try to respond to all of your feedback below:
We can't thank you enough for the really detailed feedback, appreciate it! I'm sending over all of these notes to the team, and if you have any more comments, feel free to message me directly!
Hi Ariel,
Thanks for the compliment and feedback!
We do have an internal discovery process that our projects go through that includes project hypothesis, investigation on use-cases, validation, prioritization, markcomms strategy, guerrilla testing, etc. You can get a peak of the process here, although it's not a complete view.
We concluded that we wanted our two target audiences to be folks who care about wild animal welfare/suffering, and advocates in vegan spaces focused on factory farming— so we built the website with that in mind. That said, we hope it appeals to EA/rationalists and normal folks in some way, but we're always looking to improve if we're missing that target.
I'll send this feedback back to the team for review, appreciate the question!
Hey JP,
Thanks so much— I've forwarded your feedback to Kate, I'm sure she'll appreciate it!
I noticed you're a software engineer here, if you'd ever like to jump on a call with me to just chat and pick each others brains, feel free to message me. I run a tech based capacity building organization called Vegan Hacktivists and our work often intersects with EA-aligned orgs working in the farmed animal space.
Thanks again, cheers!
I'm not the OP but according to this post, that should be perfectly fine— especially if you don't mention voting what-so-ever. The idea is that upvotes and downvotes occur naturally and internally by the reader with no outside influence (or as little as there can be).
Sharing is simply sharing, and we should encourage it.