Great post!

A and B about 30 years are useful ideas/talking points. Thanks for the reminder/articulation!

I'm definitely aware of that complication but I don't think that is the best way to broader impact. Uncertainty abounds.  If I can get it out in 3 months, I will. 

Thanks for sharing, this and the others.  I read that one and it was a bit more about the rationality community than the risks. (It's in the list with a different title)

FYI, I'm working on a book about the risks of AGI/ASI for a general and I hope to get it out within 6 months. It likely won't be as alarmist as your post but will try to communicate the key messages, the importance, the risks, and the urgency. Happy to have more help. 

Thank you for a great post and the outreach you are doing.  We need more posts and discussions about optimal framing. 

I was referring to external credibility if you are looking for a scientific paper with the key ideas. Secondarily, an online, modular guide is not quite the frame of the book either (although it could possible be adapted towards such a thing in the future)

Interesting points. I'm working on a book which is not quite a solution to your issue but hopefully goes in the same direction. 
And I'm now curious to see that memo :)

I am fully supportive of more books coming out on EA related topics. I've also always enjoyed your writings. 

As someone trying to write a book about the threat of AI for a broader audience, I've learned that you should have a good idea of your goal for the book's distribution.  Meaning, is your goal to get this published by a publisher?
Or self-publish?  An eCopy or audiobook?

To get something published, you typically need an agent. To get an agent you usually need a one-page pitch, a writing sample, and perhaps an outline. 

If no agent is interested, it is a risk to write the book if you want a third party to publish it. 
 

Thought that this was filled with interesting ideas. Thank you.

If open to constructive feedback, I think that there is an opportunity (mainly for host but also perhaps you as guest) to reduce the amount of 'likes' that are equivalent to 'ums' in your speech. 

This may be cultural/generational, and perhaps few others care, but personally I found parts hard to listen to because there were so many 'likes'. 

I couldn't help but be curious, so I did a search on the transcript and it pops up 577 times (of course, a decent chunk of those are not filler but part of normal speech).