I agree with the second paragraph of this comment.
Regarding the third paragraph,
In this post, the poster writes "Therefore, I feel comfortable questioning these grants using burner accounts," which suggests in fact that they do have multiple burner accounts.
In my specific case,
I'm not describing this post as a response to the other post.
I initially wrote at the top of this post that,
I wanted to offer a different perspective on this post ...
and I believe that this warranted a separate post. In no way was this meant to be a rebuttal of all the arguments made there. I apologise for the confusion.
At the top of the post, I've now clarified that I'm offering a different perspective (to add to the public discourse) and that this made more sense to me as a post than a comment and NOT a rebuttal.
Thank you for sharing.
I wasn't aware that Open Philanthropy had a relationship disclosure policy. I wonder what other policies they have or had to prevent potential "favoritism" in their grantmaking.