Hide table of contents

Hi everyone! I am an International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma student looking to write my required Extended Essay (4000 words) in a topic related to effective altruism. I have been reading about it and following EA ever since 9th grade.

For the extended essay, I chose the subject of economics and proposed the following questions to my advisor (econ teacher):

  • To what extent can we measure the effectiveness and sustainability of charity organizations?
  • How can microeconomic policy and innovation be stimulated in sub-Saharan Africa to bring about wider access to renewable energy?
  • To what extent are imposing different types of wealth taxes in USA effective for decreasing the wealth gap? 
  • What are the marginal social costs of malaria on individual households in Africa?

However, these were all shot down. In order for me to get a good score on my essay, the research question has to be (1) very specific to the region & subject matter (2) tie into an economics concept learned in class, preferably microeconomics, because it is more specific and "micro", and (3) have some research and data already written to back up my claim.

The problem is that everything I am interested about it too broad. I ended up coming up with these questions:

  • To what effect has the COVID-19 pandemic affected the pricing strategy of gym franchises in the US?
  • How will Netflix's crackdown on password-sharing affect its competition with other streaming services?
  • To what extent does differential license plate pricing in Shanghai effectively reduce the consumption of internal combustion engine vehicles, compared to direct subsidies to purchasing EVs?

These can guarantee that I get a good question as a basis to my essay, but I find them so uninteresting. When I chose economics I wanted to be able to talk about things I was passionate about, but instead I find myself obsessing about the grading.

My question is, does anyone have any suggestions into topics I could write about that have fit the criteria? Is there anyway I could modify my questions to make them EA-related or more meaningful?

2

0
0

Reactions

0
0
New Answer
New Comment


3 Answers sorted by

Sorry that you're struggling to find something here! I don't have any great ideas, but some stuff that might be promising avenues to explore:

You might also want to look at Charity Entrepreneurship's research: https://www.charityentrepreneurship.com/research (road safety could be interesting?). Best of luck!!

Hey! Thank you SO much for all these resources! They were very helpful, and I'm glad there are a lot more opportunities to write about EA than I thought.

One option for generating new ideas:

-make a list of 10+ concepts from your economics class

-make a list of 10+ topics/questions you find interesting or important (ideally ones you already know you can find data on, like what Shakeel posted or topics from Our World in Data)

-start mixing and matching from the two lists to see if you can find some interesting essay topics (behavioural economics and road safety? cost curves and tobacco policy?)

Another option for generating ideas, depending on your mark scheme:

-find an interesting and important scholarly article

-what's one unstated assumption the author made, or something they forgot to think about?

-write an updated version of their paper (potentially including running some updated analysis on their data!) to account for whatever they missed out when they published their paper

This is so helpful for coming up with a research question, thank you so much! The list methods works so well for me.

You may want to check out: https://effectivethesis.org/thesis-topics/

will need to scope it down to something more manageable for 4k words. You may also be able to apply for coaching with them. All the best!

Oh my god, the resource I didn't know I needed, thank you so much!

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
The AI safety community has grown rapidly since the ChatGPT wake-up call, but available funding doesn’t seem to have kept pace. However, there’s a more recent dynamic that’s created even better funding opportunities, which I witnessed as a recommender in the most recent SFF grant round.[1]   Most philanthropic (vs. government or industry) AI safety funding (>50%) comes from one source: Good Ventures. But they’ve recently stopped funding several categories of work (my own categories, not theirs): * Many Republican-leaning think tanks, such as the Foundation for American Innovation. * “Post-alignment” causes such as digital sentience or regulation of explosive growth. * The rationality community, including LessWrong, Lightcone, SPARC, CFAR, MIRI. * High school outreach, such as Non-trivial. In addition, they are currently not funding (or not fully funding): * Many non-US think tanks, who don’t want to appear influenced by an American organisation (there’s now probably more than 20 of these). * They do fund technical safety non-profits like FAR AI, though they’re probably underfunding this area, in part due to difficulty hiring for this area the last few years (though they’ve hired recently). * Political campaigns, since foundations can’t contribute to them. * Organisations they’ve decided are below their funding bar for whatever reason (e.g. most agent foundations work). OP is not infallible so some of these might still be worth funding. * Nuclear security, since it’s on average less cost-effective than direct AI funding, so isn’t one of the official cause areas (though I wouldn’t be surprised if there were some good opportunities there). This means many of the organisations in these categories have only been able to access a a minority of the available philanthropic capital (in recent history, I’d guess ~25%). In the recent SFF grant round, I estimate they faced a funding bar 1.5 to 3 times higher. This creates a lot of opportunities for other donors
 ·  · 1m read
 · 
LewisBollard
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
Note: This post was crossposted from the Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare Research Newsletter by the Forum team, with the author's permission. The author may not see or respond to comments on this post. ---------------------------------------- Progress for factory-farmed animals is far too slow. But it is happening. Practices that once seemed permanent — like battery cages and the killing of male chicks — are now on a slow path to extinction. Animals who were once ignored — like fish and even shrimp — are now finally seeing reforms, by the billions. It’s easy to gloss over such numbers. So, as you read the wins below, I encourage you to consider each of these animals as an individual. A hen no longer confined to a cage, a chick no longer macerated alive, a fish no longer dying a prolonged death. I also encourage you to reflect on the role you and your fellow advocates and funders played in these wins. I’m inspired by what you’ve achieved. I hope you will be too. 1. About Cluckin’ Time. Over 1,000 companies globally have now fulfilled their pledges to go cage-free. McDonald’s implemented its pledge in the US and Canada two years ahead of schedule, sparing seven million hens from cages. Subway implemented its pledge in Europe, the Middle East, Oceania, and Indonesia. Yum Brands, owner of KFC and Pizza Hut, reported that for 25,000 of its restaurants it is now 90% cage-free. These are not cheap changes: one UK retailer, Lidl, recently invested £1 billion just to transition part of its egg supply chain to free-range. 2. The Egg-sodus: Cracking Open Cages. In five of Europe’s seven biggest egg markets — France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and the UK — at least two-thirds of hens are now cage-free. In the US, about 40% of hens are — up from a mere 6% a decade ago. In Brazil, where large-scale cage-free production didn’t exist a decade ago, about 15% of hens are now cage-free. And in Japan, where it still barely exists, the nation’s largest egg buyer, Kewpi