I volunteer with a small community-based project in Lucknow, which helps support tuberculosis (TB) patients in accessing healthcare. India has the ambitious goal of ending TB by 2025 – but we are currently a long way off, with over 2.8 million cases and 340,000 deaths annually.  The government needs to make much greater efforts to actively find ‘missing’ TB cases and ensure all TB patients receive treatment - and adequate nutrition.

To this end, I have reviewed some of the literature and compiled a set of five policy proposals that can make a significant contribution to tackling the epidemic:

  1. Employing community-based TB workers with a mandate of TB case finding and patient support.
  2. Giving small incentives to encourage household contacts of TB patients to get screened and take Tuberculosis Preventative Treatment (TPT).
  3. Triaging TB patients at point of diagnosis, and hospitalising those most at risk of adverse outcomes.
  4. Providing free lentils to households of TB patients through the public distribution system, to improve nutrition.
  5. Conducting evening OPDs in government hospitals to enable poor households to seek healthcare more convenient.
Simplified theory of change diagram for the five proposed policies

This draft report shares these policy proposals in more detail, as well as cost-efficacy analyses, literature reviews, and stories from the field. You can find the spreadsheet with cost-efficacy calculations here. If you want to leave comments on the report, here is the google doc version (less visually attractive).

My rough calculations indicate that the policies have cost-efficacy around US$100 per DALY averted – competitive with top GiveWell charities. While implementing these policies would require roughly 32 billion INR (nearly USD 400 million) per year, they would avert some 4 million DALYs.[1] 

I would appreciate feedback and suggestions: on any of these policy ideas, on other ideas we should include, on any improvements in the analysis.[2] If you would like to be more heavily involved in this project, I am looking for co-authors to collaborate with - please drop a comment below. Ultimately, we want to be part of a coalition to approach relevant state and national authorities and advocate for piloting some of these policies.

 

  1. ^

    The current National Tuberculosis Elimination Program is only about 31 billion INR. The fact that these five highly cost-effective policies, which would require a doubling of the TB budget, are projected to avert only 13% of India's DALYs lost due to TB is a stark indication that the government is not spending nearly as much as required to come even close to ending TB.

  2. ^

    One particular methodological question I’m curious about is how best to factor in the indirect effects when dealing with an infectious disease like TB. That is, averting one case of TB now (e.g. through better nutrition) is likely to avert some number of future cases who would have been infected from that index case. I couldn’t find much in the literature on this, but ended up going for Shrestha et al’s model, which dealt with active case finding in a medium sized Indian city. Shrestha found that their proposed intervention averted 81 deaths (directly) in Year 1, and 143 deaths (indirectly) in Years 2-10, giving a ratio of approximately 1 : 1.8.

12

0
0

Reactions

0
0
Comments1


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

Yep... this stuff is simultaneously fairly obvious and surprisingly neglected. I have been looking at TB programs in various developing countries and the best policy proposals all include these components - although the details differ in some places. Implementation is a challenge.

I've been paying special attention to household contacts screening for TB and preventative treatment (TPT; your policy #2). While TPT for household contacts is extraordinarily cost-effective, it is quite frustrating to make progress on this, because of the reasons the report cites: general lack of awareness of TB dangers, as well as that it is quite hard to convince people who are not visibly sick to travel with their family, possibly long distances, to hospitals to get screened and take 3-month courses (or longer!) of preventative antibiotics with sometimes-severe side effects.

Glad to see more people working on this.

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 11m read
 · 
Does a food carbon tax increase animal deaths and/or the total time of suffering of cows, pigs, chickens, and fish? Theoretically, this is possible, as a carbon tax could lead consumers to substitute, for example, beef with chicken. However, this is not per se the case, as animal products are not perfect substitutes.  I'm presenting the results of my master's thesis in Environmental Economics, which I re-worked and published on SSRN as a pre-print. My thesis develops a model of animal product substitution after a carbon tax, slaughter tax, and a meat tax. When I calibrate[1] this model for the U.S., there is a decrease in animal deaths and duration of suffering following a carbon tax. This suggests that a carbon tax can reduce animal suffering. Key points * Some animal products are carbon-intensive, like beef, but causes relatively few animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are large. Other animal products, like chicken, causes relatively many animal deaths or total time of suffering because the animals are small, but cause relatively low greenhouse gas emissions. * A carbon tax will make some animal products, like beef, much more expensive. As a result, people may buy more chicken. This would increase animal suffering, assuming that farm animals suffer. However, this is not per se the case. It is also possible that the direct negative effect of a carbon tax on chicken consumption is stronger than the indirect (positive) substitution effect from carbon-intensive products to chicken. * I developed a non-linear market model to predict the consumption of different animal products after a tax, based on own-price and cross-price elasticities. * When calibrated for the United States, this model predicts a decrease in the consumption of all animal products considered (beef, chicken, pork, and farmed fish). Therefore, the modelled carbon tax is actually good for animal welfare, assuming that animals live net-negative lives. * A slaughter tax (a
MarieF🔸
 ·  · 4m read
 · 
Summary * After >2 years at Hi-Med, I have decided to step down from my role. * This allows me to complete my medical residency for long-term career resilience, whilst still allowing part-time flexibility for direct charity work. It also allows me to donate more again. * Hi-Med is now looking to appoint its next Executive Director; the application deadline is 26 January 2025. * I will join Hi-Med’s governing board once we have appointed the next Executive Director. Before the role When I graduated from medical school in 2017, I had already started to give 10% of my income to effective charities, but I was unsure as to how I could best use my medical degree to make this world a better place. After dipping my toe into nonprofit fundraising (with Doctors Without Borders) and working in a medical career-related start-up to upskill, a talk given by Dixon Chibanda at EAG London 2018 deeply inspired me. I formed a rough plan to later found an organisation that would teach Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-specific psychotherapeutic techniques to lay people to make evidence-based treatment of PTSD scalable. I started my medical residency in psychosomatic medicine in 2019, working for a specialised clinic for PTSD treatment until 2021, then rotated to child and adolescent psychiatry for a year and was half a year into the continuation of my specialisation training at a third hospital, when Akhil Bansal, whom I met at a recent EAG in London, reached out and encouraged me to apply for the ED position at Hi-Med - an organisation that I knew through my participation in their introductory fellowship (an academic paper about the outcomes of this first cohort can be found here). I seized the opportunity, applied, was offered the position, and started working full-time in November 2022.  During the role I feel truly privileged to have had the opportunity to lead High Impact Medicine for the past two years. My learning curve was steep - there were so many new things to
Ozzie Gooen
 ·  · 9m read
 · 
We’re releasing Squiggle AI, a tool that generates probabilistic models using the Squiggle language. This can provide early cost-effectiveness models and other kinds of probabilistic programs. No prior Squiggle knowledge is required to use Squiggle AI. Simply ask for whatever you want to estimate, and the results should be fairly understandable. The Squiggle programming language acts as an adjustable backend, but isn’t mandatory to learn. Beyond being directly useful, we’re interested in Squiggle AI as an experiment in epistemic reasoning with LLMs. We hope it will help highlight potential strengths, weaknesses, and directions for the field. Screenshots The “Playground” view after it finishes a successful workflow. Form on the left, code in the middle, code output on the right.The “Steps” page. Shows all of the steps that the workflow went through, next to the form on the left. For each, shows a simplified view of recent messages to and from the LLM. Motivation Organizations in the effective altruism and rationalist communities regularly rely on cost-effectiveness analyses and fermi estimates to guide their decisions. QURI's mission is to make these probabilistic tools more accessible and reliable for altruistic causes. However, our experience with tools like Squiggle and Guesstimate has revealed a significant challenge: even highly skilled domain experts frequently struggle with the basic programming requirements and often make errors in their models. This suggests a need for alternative approaches. Language models seem particularly well-suited to address these difficulties. Fermi estimates typically follow straightforward patterns and rely on common assumptions, making them potentially ideal candidates for LLM assistance. Previous direct experiments with Claude and ChatGPT alone proved insufficient, but with substantial iteration, we've developed a framework that significantly improves the output quality and user experience. We're focusing specifically on